Is `catch(...) { throw; }` a bad practice?

Posted by ereOn on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by ereOn
Published on 2011-12-05T09:05:07Z Indexed on 2012/09/24 21:49 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 121

Filed under:

While I agree that catching ... without rethrowing is indeed wrong, I however believe that using constructs like this:

try
{
  // Stuff
}
catch (...)
{
  // Some cleanup
  throw;
}

Is acceptable in cases where RAII is not applicable. (Please, don't ask... not everybody in my company likes object-oriented programming and RAII is often seen as "useless school stuff"...)

My coworkers says that you should always know what exceptions are to be thrown and that you can always use constructs like:

try
{
  // Stuff
}
catch (exception_type1&)
{
  // Some cleanup
  throw;
}
catch (exception_type2&)
{
  // Some cleanup
  throw;
}
catch (exception_type3&)
{
  // Some cleanup
  throw;
}

Is there a well admited good practice regarding these situations?

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about c++